| Task 8<\/td> | Describing an Unusual Situation<\/td> | 30 seconds<\/td> | 60 seconds<\/td> | Describe what might be happening in an unusual photo<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n Notice the time limits. You get 30-60 seconds<\/strong> to prepare and 60-90 seconds<\/strong> to speak. This is where most candidates panic. Templates give you a mental roadmap so you spend preparation time thinking about what<\/strong> to say, not how<\/strong> to say it.<\/p>\n\n\n\nTemplate 1: Giving Advice (Task 1) \u2013 The P.A.R. Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\nWhat is it?<\/strong> In Task 1, you’ll see a scenario where someone has a problem (e.g., “Your friend wants to improve their health but doesn’t have time to go to the gym”). You must give clear, practical advice in 90 seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy test-takers fail:<\/strong> They give vague advice (“Just try to exercise more”) without explaining how<\/strong> or why<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe P.A.R. Template:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- P = Problem Acknowledgment<\/strong> (10 seconds): Restate the problem to show you understand.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- A = Advice (First Option)<\/strong> (30 seconds): Give specific, actionable advice with reasons.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- R = Reinforce (Second Option\/Consequence)<\/strong> (30 seconds): Provide an alternative or explain the positive outcome.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Closing<\/strong> (20 seconds): Summarize and encourage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Example (Level 9+ Response):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n“I totally understand your situation-finding time to exercise when you’re busy is really challenging. Here’s what I’d suggest. First, try incorporating short workouts into your daily routine. For example, you could do 15-minute high-intensity interval training sessions at home using free YouTube videos. This way, you don’t need a gym membership or commute time, and you’ll still get an effective workout. Alternatively, you could start walking or cycling to work instead of driving. This kills two birds with one stone-you get exercise and save on transportation costs. Both options are realistic and won’t disrupt your schedule. Give one of them a try for two weeks and see how you feel. I’m confident you’ll notice a difference in your energy levels pretty quickly.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy this works:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Content\/Coherence:<\/strong> The response directly addresses the problem and provides two clear solutions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Vocabulary:<\/strong> Uses varied phrases (“kills two birds with one stone,” “disrupt your schedule,” “energy levels”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Listenability:<\/strong> Natural flow with contractions (“I’d suggest,” “you’ll still get”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Time:<\/strong> Exactly 90 seconds when spoken at natural pace.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Personalization Tip:<\/strong> Always insert real examples from your life. Instead of “try YouTube videos,” say “I personally use a channel called Fitness Blender-it’s free and works great.”<\/p>\n\n\n\nTemplate 2: Describing a Scene (Task 3) \u2013 The Z.O.O.M. Method<\/h2>\n\n\n\nWhat is it?<\/strong> You’ll see a picture (usually a busy scene like a park, office, or street) and must describe what’s happening in 60 seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy test-takers fail:<\/strong> They describe random details without structure, leaving out key elements or running out of time.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe Z.O.O.M. Template:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Z = Zoom Out (Overview)<\/strong> (10 seconds): Describe the general setting.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- O = Observe Key Figures<\/strong> (20 seconds): Focus on the main people\/actions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- O = Other Details<\/strong> (20 seconds): Mention background elements, weather, mood.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- M = Make a Connection<\/strong> (10 seconds): Relate the scene to something familiar.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Example (Level 9+ Response):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n“This picture shows a busy city park on what looks like a sunny weekend afternoon. In the foreground, I can see a young couple sitting on a bench, having a picnic. The woman is laughing, and the man is pouring drinks from a thermos. Behind them, there’s a group of children playing soccer on the grass, and a dog running around excitedly. In the background, I notice tall buildings and trees lining the park. The atmosphere seems relaxed and joyful-it reminds me of the parks in downtown Toronto during summer, where people go to escape the hustle and bustle of city life.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy this works:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Content\/Coherence:<\/strong> Structured description from general to specific.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Vocabulary:<\/strong> Descriptive words (“foreground,” “atmosphere,” “hustle and bustle”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Listenability:<\/strong> Smooth transitions (“Behind them,” “In the background”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Task Fulfillment:<\/strong> Completes in exactly 60 seconds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Personalization Tip:<\/strong> Always connect the scene to your own experience (“This reminds me of…”). It shows natural speaking ability.<\/p>\n\n\n\nTemplate 3: Making Predictions (Task 4) \u2013 The I.M.P.A.C.T. Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\nWhat is it?<\/strong> You’ll see a situation (often with a picture) and predict what will happen next (e.g., “A man is rushing to catch a bus. What do you think will happen?”).<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy test-takers fail:<\/strong> They make illogical predictions or fail to explain why<\/strong> they think something will happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe I.M.P.A.C.T. Template:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- I = Initial Observation<\/strong> (10 seconds): Describe what’s happening now.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- M = Most Likely Outcome<\/strong> (20 seconds): Predict the immediate result.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- P = Possible Complication<\/strong> (15 seconds): Mention a potential problem.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- A = Alternative Scenario<\/strong> (10 seconds): Offer a different possibility.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- C = Consequence<\/strong> (5 seconds): Briefly state the final outcome.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Example (Level 9+ Response):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n“In this picture, I can see a man sprinting toward a bus that’s about to leave the stop. Based on the image, I think he’ll probably catch the bus just in time because he’s only a few meters away and the bus driver might notice him running. However, there’s a chance he could miss it if the doors close before he gets there, which would be frustrating-he’d have to wait for the next bus and might be late for work. Alternatively, if he does catch it, he’ll likely be out of breath and need a moment to recover. Either way, this situation highlights how stressful public transportation can be during rush hour.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy this works:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Content\/Coherence:<\/strong> Logical prediction with reasoning.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Vocabulary:<\/strong> Precise verbs (“sprinting,” “notice,” “highlights”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Listenability:<\/strong> Natural hedging language (“probably,” “there’s a chance,” “might”).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Personalization Tip:<\/strong> Connect to your own experience (“I’ve been in this exact situation before when…”).<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nStruggling to know if your CELPIP predictions and descriptions make sense to examiners?<\/strong> Langogh’s AI evaluates your logic, coherence, and vocabulary in real-time, showing you exactly where you lost points and how to fix it. Get Instant Feedback on Your Speaking \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nTemplate 4: Comparing and Persuading (Task 5) \u2013 The P.R.O.\/C.O.N. Method<\/h2>\n\n\n\nWhat is it?<\/strong> You’ll choose between two options (e.g., “Should the company hold a team-building event at a restaurant or an outdoor adventure park?”) and persuade someone why your choice is better.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy test-takers fail:<\/strong> They don’t actually compare-they just talk about one option, or they flip-flop between choices without committing.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe P.R.O.\/C.O.N. Template:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Position Statement<\/strong> (5 seconds): State your choice clearly.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Reason 1 (Practical)<\/strong> (20 seconds): Give a functional advantage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Reason 2 (Emotional\/Social)<\/strong> (20 seconds): Explain the personal benefit.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Acknowledge the Other Option<\/strong> (10 seconds): Show balance by mentioning the alternative.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Closing (Reinforce Your Choice)<\/strong> (5 seconds): Restate your recommendation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Example (Level 9+ Response):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n“I strongly believe the outdoor adventure park is the better choice for the team-building event. First of all, from a practical standpoint, an adventure park offers a wide variety of activities like zip-lining, rock climbing, and obstacle courses, which means everyone can find something they enjoy, regardless of fitness level. More importantly, these activities require teamwork and communication, which directly builds the skills we need in the office. On the emotional side, an outdoor setting helps people relax and bond in a way that a formal restaurant never could-you’re laughing, overcoming challenges together, and creating real memories. Now, I understand a restaurant is more convenient and comfortable, especially for those who aren’t into physical activities, but I think the long-term benefits of an adventure park outweigh the short-term comfort. So, my recommendation is definitely the adventure park.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy this works:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Content\/Coherence:<\/strong> Clear position with logical reasons and acknowledgment of the alternative.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Vocabulary:<\/strong> Strong persuasive language (“strongly believe,” “directly builds,” “outweigh”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Listenability:<\/strong> Transitional phrases (“First of all,” “More importantly,” “Now, I understand”).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Personalization Tip:<\/strong> Reference specific team-building experiences you’ve had (“When my previous company did something similar…”).<\/p>\n\n\n\nTemplate 5: Dealing with a Difficult Situation (Task 6) \u2013 The S.T.A.R. Adaptation<\/h2>\n\n\n\nWhat is it?<\/strong> You’ll face a workplace or social conflict (e.g., “Your colleague keeps taking credit for your work. What do you do?”) and must explain how you’d handle it professionally.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy test-takers fail:<\/strong> They give overly aggressive solutions (“I’d report them to HR immediately”) or overly passive ones (“I’d just ignore it”).<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe S.T.A.R. Template (Adapted for CELPIP):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- S = Situation Acknowledgment<\/strong> (5 seconds): Show you understand the problem.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- T = Thoughtful First Step<\/strong> (20 seconds): Explain a calm, direct approach.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- A = Alternative Action (If That Fails)<\/strong> (20 seconds): Escalate appropriately.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- R = Resolution\/Reflection<\/strong> (15 seconds): Explain the expected positive outcome.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Example (Level 9+ Response):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n“This is definitely a frustrating situation, and I’d want to handle it professionally. My first step would be to have a private, one-on-one conversation with my colleague. I’d calmly explain that I’ve noticed they’ve been presenting my ideas in meetings without mentioning my contribution, and I’d ask if they realize they’re doing it. Sometimes people don’t even know they’re taking credit-it’s not always intentional. If the behavior continues after that conversation, I’d document specific examples and bring the issue to my manager, framing it as a communication problem rather than a personal attack. The goal isn’t to get anyone in trouble-it’s to establish clear credit for work and maintain a positive team environment. By addressing it early and diplomatically, I’d prevent resentment from building up and protect my professional reputation.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy this works:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n- Content\/Coherence:<\/strong> Logical escalation from direct conversation to managerial involvement.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Vocabulary:<\/strong> Professional tone (“diplomatically,” “framing it as,” “maintain a positive environment”).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Listenability:<\/strong> Empathetic language (“Sometimes people don’t even know”).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Personalization Tip:<\/strong> If you’ve experienced a similar situation, briefly mention it (“I actually faced something like this at my previous job, and here’s what worked…”).<\/p>\n\n\n\nCommon CELPIP Speaking Mistakes That Kill Your Score (And How to Avoid Them)<\/h2>\n\n\n\nEven with perfect templates, these mistakes will drag your score down:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. Using Filler Words Excessively<\/h3>\n\n\n\nThe Problem:<\/strong> Saying “um,” “uh,” “like,” “you know” repeatedly signals poor fluency.
\nThe Fix:<\/strong> Practice pausing silently instead of filling gaps. A 1-second pause sounds more confident than “um, uh, so, like.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n2. Speaking Too Slowly to Fill Time<\/h3>\n\n\n\nThe Problem:<\/strong> Test-takers deliberately slow down to reach 60-90 seconds, which sounds unnatural and robotic.
\nThe Fix:<\/strong> Speak at a normal conversational pace (150-160 words per minute) and add depth to your content instead of stretching words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n3. Repeating the Same Vocabulary<\/h3>\n\n\n\nThe Problem:<\/strong> Using “good,” “nice,” “important” in every answer limits your Vocabulary score.
\nThe Fix:<\/strong> Build synonym clusters. Instead of “good,” use: beneficial, advantageous, valuable, favorable, effective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n4. Ignoring Pronunciation Patterns<\/h3>\n\n\n\nThe Problem:<\/strong> Mispronouncing common words or using flat intonation makes you hard to understand.
\nThe Fix:<\/strong> Record yourself and compare to native speakers. Focus on word stress (e.g., “PREsent” vs. “preSENT”).<\/p>\n\n\n\n5. Not Answering All Parts of the Question<\/h3>\n\n\n\nThe Problem:<\/strong> Tasks often have multiple parts (“Explain the problem AND suggest a solution”). Missing one part costs major points.
\nThe Fix:<\/strong> During preparation time, underline each part of the question and check them off mentally as you speak.<\/p>\n\n\n\nFor a complete breakdown of score-killing mistakes, check out our guide on 7 devastating CELPIP mistakes<\/a> that cost test-takers $280+ in retakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\nHow to Practice CELPIP Speaking Effectively (The 4-Week Plan)<\/h2>\n\n\n\nTemplates are useless without consistent, strategic practice. Here’s the exact plan that took students from Level 6 to Level 9+ in 4-6 weeks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Week 1: Template Familiarization<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n- Day 1-2:<\/strong> Memorize the structure (not the words) of all 5 templates.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Day 3-4:<\/strong> Practice each template with 2 different prompts, recording yourself.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Day 5-7:<\/strong> Review recordings, identify filler words and vocabulary repetition.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Week 2: Personalization & Vocabulary Building<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n- Daily:<\/strong> Answer 1 prompt from each task type using templates, but insert personal examples.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Focus:<\/strong> Build synonym lists for overused words (good, bad, important, nice).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Goal:<\/strong> Eliminate 80% of filler words.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
|
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/langogh.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/CELPIP-Speaking-Tips-5-Proven-Templates-for-Level-9-2026-Guide-1-1024x683.webp\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n